The Occupy Movement in the 2012 Elections
Just as the Tea Party did in 2009 and 2010, Occupiers have begun to shift American political discourse. We are now more aware of, and more outraged by, the growing income disparity in our country and the pervasive role of money in our elections. This trend may merely be indicative of the cyclical nature of American political interests, but I prefer to believe in the power of Occupy Wall Street and its message.
Concurrently, though, there is something quietly unsettling about the movement. Perhaps it is that I still believe in the capitalist system, and I cringe every time my peers use the words “dirty capitalist” or “bouji.” Or perhaps, it is that I am waiting for the Occupy movement to materialize into a real operation for political change within the confines of our flawed two party system. Occupiers believe that the American political process once belonged to the American people but has since been co-opted by corporations, special interests groups, and big money. The movement is characterized by a desire to reclaim the American political process – a goal that cannot be achieved entirely by operating outside that same system.
http://tinyurl.com/7zpqy2j
Was Occupy’s “Shut Down the Corporations” Action a Success?
If the action was intended only to be educational, then it surely succeeded, since numerous news outlets had to explain to the public the main target of the actions: ALEC, a group of corporations that work together to buy off politicians so that pro-corporate laws can be passed and anti-1% laws can be defeated.
However, if the goal of the day of action was to build power towards winning concrete victories for working people, Shut Down the Corporations must be viewed with greater scrutiny.
Although education is a crucial component in any social movement, it must be incorporated into a larger strategy of building power among the 99%. This creates an easy barometer to assess Occupy or labor movement actions: does the action build power or not?
http://tinyurl.com/86park2
The Truth About Drug-Testing the Unemployed
The new federal law that lets states drug-test applicants for unemployment compensation was a small win for the Republican-led efforts to examine the urine of everyone receiving government safety-net benefits. How many people it will affect depends on how the Department of Labor establishes the regulations-and on whether the courts continue to hold that such policies violate the Constitution’s protection against unreasonable searches.
House Republicans initially wanted to let states drug-test all 7.5 million people collecting unemployment compensation. The compromise reached in the payroll tax-cut deal, along with cutting six months off the time people can collect, authorizes states to test applicants for benefits in two circumstances: if they were fired for using drugs, or if the only occupation they’re suited for is one the Department of Labor lists as commonly requiring drug-testing.
http://tinyurl.com/76u33c5
Continue reading “The OB Media Rundown for 3/4/12” »