Directions: From the Broadway T Stop in South Boston, this location is just a few blocks east on West Broadway (look for Veterans For Peace White Flags)
Why are there two Parades in South Boston on Sunday, March 18th?
This is a question all Bostonians should be asking themselves; this is a question all politicians who participate in the morning roast or who will march in the first parade should be asking themselves; a questions that the press should ask all politicians and City of Boston leaders; a question that everyone associated with or watching the parades should be asking themselves…
Well over a hundred years ago, the Irish walked through the streets of Boston protesting “discrimination” against the Irish. Today, the organizers of the “traditional” Saint Patrick’s Day Parade discriminate against two groups who only wanted to walk in the first parade.
First: Veterans For Peace, a group of veterans of the U.S. military who have dutifully served this country, many during time of war; members include veterans of WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. These are veterans who have received numerous decorations for valiant service to this country, who know all too well the consequences of war, its violence, its brutality, and the pain it causes to veterans and their families. These veterans, who now stand for and advocate peace, have been denied to walk in the traditional parade and carry flags and banners, some of which read: “Bring the Troops Home and Take Care of Them When the Get Here,” “Cut Military Spending, Save Jobs, Police, Fireman, Teachers,” “Peace is Patriotic.” For these sentiments, their application to walk in the traditional parade was denied?
Second: gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) youth, adults, and groups, such as Join the Impact, who just wanted to walk in the traditional parade and were denied because of who they are. In 2012, a time when Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is history; when gay marriage is now law; when transgender people finally have non-discrimination protections; and when there is a large GLBT population living in South Boston, they are still denied to walk, as a group, in the traditional parade. Discrimination against any group is a disgrace and should be unacceptable and an affront to all Americans–yet this exclusion continues as politicians, the press, parade participants, and residents of South Boston look the other way. It is easy to walk in a parade–it is fun to watch and hear all the pageantry of a parade. Sometimes, though, it is difficult and uncomfortable to stand up and support what is right, even when the opportunity is staring you in the face as it marches by.
In their one-sentence denials to both Veterans For Peace and Join the Impact, there were no reasons given as to why their applications were denied. When John (Wacko) Hurley (of the Allied War Council) was directly asked by Kay Walsh, the chair of the community organizing meeting, why Veterans For Peace were denied, he only repeated, as if pleading the fifth, “I can only refer you to the decision,” referring to the 1995 decision of the U.S. Supreme court brought about because of their denial of Gay and Lesbian groups seventeen years ago. When directly asked by Kay to allow Veterans For Peace to walk in the parade, once again, he only repeated, “I refer you to the decision.”
“Make no mistake about it, this is a very militaristic parade hiding behind the robes of Saint Patrick. We understand the legality the Allied War Council hide behind,” said Pat Scanlon, the Coordinator of Veterans For Peace. “We do not understand the morality; we have some highly decorated veterans, who have put their lives on the line for this country and are not allowed, nor welcomed, in the first parade because they now stand for peace? Shame on the Allied War Council for promoting division, exclusion, and prejudice, and shame on the City of Boston for allowing such blatant discrimination to continue. Shame on any politician who participates in the first parade, knowing such flagrant, narrow-minded bigotry against veterans and the GLBT community continues. The City of Boston should take back the running of the first parade. This type of exclusion is just not acceptable in 2012.”
For more information, the website for the Smedley D. Butler Brigade of Veterans For Peace is www.SmedleyVFP.org.
5 Responses to “SAINT PATRICK’S PEACE PARADE: Why are there two Parades in South Boston on Sunday, March 18th?”
on March 16th, 2012 at 2:22 pm #
[…] link: SAINT PATRICK’S PEACE PARADE: Why are there two Parades in South Boston on Sunday, March 18th? This entry was posted in Boston and tagged boston, city, country, korea, lesbian, […]
http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Saint-Patrick-was-likely-a-slave-trader-and-tax-collector-says-new-British-evidence-143037936.html
“Flechner says St Patrick likely became a slave trader to set himself up in Ireland as there was no monetary economy there and slave trading was the main basis for the economy.
Flechner believes Patrick very likely bought slaves in England and then used them to trade when he moved to Ireland. The new version of Saint Patrick’s life is certainly controversial but Flechner says it is far more likely to be true than the legend…”
What on earth is your point
The traditional South Boston St. Patrick’s parade is a privately organized parade. It is NOT thrown by the city. It is by invitation only. (FWIW, I know the Pride parade – another privately organized parade – does not allow any group that wishes to march, either).
Is it discriminatory? Yes. But the Veterans For Peace group did use proper channels, went through the courts, and lost.
There are other solutions as well – find ANOTHER parade to join that is welcoming, and promote said parade… OR (even better)… find another venue – kick up a parade in another section of Boston, invite organizations, and celebrate with people who want no part of the obnoxiousness of Southie on St. Patrick’s Day, rather than looking like the wanna-be groupie following in the heels of an organization which is NOT going to change.
>Well over a hundred years ago, the Irish walked through the streets of >Boston protesting “discrimination” against the Irish.
What’s with the quote marks? Are you seriously suggesting that the Irish didn’t actually suffer discrimination in Boston? This would be both historically inaccurate and undercut the entire point of the article, so I would respectfully suggest that you remove them. Thanks!